---
title: "How to validate a China plastic covers integrated manufacturer for NPI?"
description: "NPI engineer faces warpage and tolerance issues during plastic cover trial validation. A capable integrated manufacturer must provide accurate mold flow analysis, robust DFM feedback, and strict process control to ensure smooth mass production transfer."
url: "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "China Sourcing Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-26"
dateModified: "2026-10-26"
brand: "HYNEU"
manufacturer: "HYNEU"
answerCount: 7
---

# How to validate a China plastic covers integrated manufacturer for NPI?

## Question

 I am currently leading the NPI phase for a new line of heavy-duty equipment enclosures, and we are evaluating a China plastic covers integrated manufacturer to produce a series of ABS+PC structural covers. The initial CAD files were sent out, and we received quotes that look highly competitive. However, during the soft tooling phase for the first prototype run, we noticed significant warpage on the larger flat surfaces and dimensional deviations on the snap-fit joints. The supplier attributed this to material shrinkage and suggested moving directly to hard steel tooling to "fix" the tolerance issues, but I am not fully convinced. I need to drive the trial validation effectively before committing to mass production tooling, but I lack visibility into their actual mold flow analysis and process control capabilities. My management is pushing to finalize the supplier to keep the project on schedule, but I am worried that skipping rigorous validation now will lead to massive scrap rates during mass production. How should I structure the trial validation process with this integrated manufacturer? What specific documentation, tooling data, and process parameters should I demand from them before approving the next tooling milestone, and how do I evaluate if they truly have the engineering depth to resolve these dimensional issues rather than just guessing? 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

Validating a structural plastic cover during the NPI phase requires strict adherence to engineering data before committing to mass production tooling. The supplier’s suggestion to move directly to hard steel tooling to resolve warpage and tolerance issues is a significant risk. Warpage on flat ABS+PC covers is typically driven by uneven cooling, inadequate wall thickness, or suboptimal gate placement. Before approving the next tooling milestone, you must require a comprehensive Mold Flow Analysis (MFA) report. This report should include fill time predictions, weld line locations, air trap identification, and critically, a warp vector plot showing the predicted deformation direction and magnitude. A capable manufacturer will use this data to optimize gate positioning and cooling line layout before cutting steel. If the supplier cannot produce this data, or if their MFA does not correlate with the physical soft tool results, they lack the engineering depth to predict and control molding behavior.

Regarding the dimensional deviations on the snap-fit joints, material shrinkage is a known variable, not an unpredictable anomaly. A professional manufacturer calculates shrinkage based on the material data sheet, part geometry, and expected molding parameters, then compensates for it during the CNC tooling cutting phase. If the soft tool is out of tolerance, the supplier must provide a root cause analysis. Ask them to explain their holding pressure strategy and gate sizing. Insufficient holding pressure or a prematurely frozen gate can cause localized shrinkage, pulling the snap-fit dimensions out of spec. You should request a First Article Inspection (FAI) report complete with CPK data for all critical dimensions. If the soft tool cannot achieve an acceptable CPK, the hard tool will likely inherit these issues, only magnified under the faster cycle times of mass production.

Committing to hard tooling prematurely will severely impact both your project cost and lead time. If the production mold is cut and structural warpage persists due to poor thermal management, you will face costly tooling modifications. Modifying a hardened steel mold to add cooling lines, adjust gate sizes, or correct parting lines requires welding, recutting, and sometimes heat treatment, which can delay the project by four to six weeks. While soft tooling iteration adds a few weeks to the NPI timeline, it is a fraction of the cost and time required to modify a production tool. In injection molding, the true cost drivers are cycle time, scrap rate, and tool maintenance frequency, not just the initial tooling quote. A cheaper initial quote loses its value if the tool requires continuous adjustment or runs at a slower cycle time to compensate for cooling inefficiencies.

To evaluate this integrated manufacturer’s true capability, assess their problem-solving methodology and process control. A reliable manufacturer will proactively suggest Design for Manufacturing (DFM) optimizations, such as adding ribs to flat surfaces, adjusting draft angles, or relocating gates to balance flow. They should be willing to run a physical T0 trial using the exact mass production resin and document the actual molding parameters used. **Require them to document the melt temperature, mold temperature, injection speed, holding pressure, and cooling time during the trial run.** Compare these parameters against the MFA simulation. If they resist providing this data or push back on running proper FAI on soft tools, it indicates they operate as a transactional producer rather than an engineering partner.

Furthermore, you need to evaluate their facility's quality control infrastructure. Ask if they utilize in-mold monitoring sensors or scientific molding principles. Scientific molding relies on cavity pressure sensors to ensure consistent filling and packing, which is critical for maintaining tight tolerances on snap-fits across different production runs. If the factory relies solely on machine settings without monitoring what happens inside the mold cavity, they will struggle to maintain dimensional stability during mass production when environmental conditions or material lots vary.

Do not let management pressure bypass these engineering gates. Set a clear milestone: **No hard tool steel cutting begins until the soft tool FAI achieves dimensional approval and the MFA predictions match the physical trial results.** If the supplier cannot demonstrate this correlation, you are risking significant scrap rates during mass production. Your decision should be based on their ability to present data-driven solutions, not just competitive pricing. Drive the validation process by demanding specific engineering deliverables, and use the soft tool data as your ultimate benchmark for mass production readiness.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Leo Shen
**Date:** 2026-10-26

### Answer 2

Before committing to mass production tooling, a physical process audit of the manufacturer’s facility is necessary to verify their actual capabilities. The warpage and dimensional issues might stem from inadequate machine tonnage or poor mold temperature control.

During the audit, specifically inspect the condition of their injection molding machines. Older machines with worn-out toggle systems may struggle to maintain consistent clamping force, leading to flash and uneven parting lines.

Request to see their historical mold maintenance records. A manufacturer that does not perform regular descaling of cooling channels will inevitably produce warped parts. Check if their facility uses water chillers with precise temperature control units for each mold.

Furthermore, evaluate their quality control laboratory. Do they have coordinate measuring machines (CMM) capable of scanning complex geometries, or are they relying solely on manual calipers? The presence of advanced inspection equipment directly correlates with their ability to provide reliable First Article Inspection data for your snap-fit deviations.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Victor Luo
**Date:** 2026-10-26

### Answer 3

The transition from soft tooling to hard tooling requires a rigorous prototype validation plan.

The supplier should not just hand over the parts; they must provide a Design for Manufacturing (DFM) report that details the expected shrinkage rates and gate locations before any steel is cut. If they skipped the DFM phase, the warpage you are experiencing was entirely predictable.

Demand a structured T0 iteration loop. When the soft tool parts warp, the manufacturer must propose specific engineering changes—such as adding cooling lines near the thick sections or modifying the flow leaders—rather than hoping the hard tool will magically solve it. Establish a functional test plan for the snap-fits. Dimensions on a drawing do not guarantee assembly success.

Require physical assembly testing of the soft tool components to validate engagement and retention force. If the prototype iteration takes longer than two weeks per cycle, it indicates a lack of in-house tooling maintenance capability, which will severely delay your mass production ramp-up.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Marcus He
**Date:** 2026-10-26

### Answer 4

Post-molding deformation is a hidden risk that often mimics dimensional instability. ABS+PC blends have a tendency to continue crystallizing and shrinking after ejection, especially on large flat surfaces.

Ask the manufacturer if they utilize cooling fixtures or jigs to hold the parts in place immediately after demolding. If they simply drop the hot parts into bins, gravity and residual heat will cause warpage that no tooling adjustment can fix.

Once the parts are molded, the packaging design becomes critical. Flat plastic covers are highly susceptible to nesting deformation if stacked under pressure. Request a transit testing plan, such as ISTA 1A or 2A, to validate the packaging.

The boxes must be designed to support the perimeter of the cover, not the center. Also, verify the label compliance and storage conditions. If the covers are packaged with desiccant but the cardboard absorbs moisture, you may face label adhesion failures or dimensional shifts during ocean freight. Packaging is not just logistics; it is an extension of quality control.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Wendy Gao
**Date:** 2026-10-26

### Answer 5

From an end-use perspective, the snap-fit failures and warpage are not just manufacturing defects; they are field performance risks. If the plastic covers warp, the mating surfaces on your final equipment will gap, exposing internal components to dust and moisture.

Evaluate the draft angles and engagement ramps on the snap-fits. If the tolerance stack-up is not accounted for, the snaps will either be too loose to hold or too tight, causing stress concentrations that lead to cracking over time.

Require physical mock-ups using the soft tool components to simulate the actual assembly process on your production line. This validates not only the fit but the tactile feedback required for operators. Furthermore, consider the environmental exposure of the covers.

Ensure the specified ABS+PC grade includes UV stabilizers if the equipment is used outdoors. A supplier that only focuses on hitting dimensional targets without understanding the end-use application will miss critical functional requirements like impact resistance at low temperatures or long-term creep resistance.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Henry Cao
**Date:** 2026-10-26

### Answer 6

The decision to skip soft tool validation and move directly to hard tooling is a false economy that will inflate your overall project cost. While soft tooling seems like an extra expense, it acts as an insurance policy against hard tool modifications.

Modifying a production mold requires welding, recutting, and texturing, which can cost thousands of dollars and weeks of lost production time. The initial quote competitiveness vanishes if the cycle time must be extended by 20% just to cool the part enough to prevent warpage.

Break down the supplier’s quotation logic. Understand their machine hour rate and how they amortize the tooling cost. If their part price is suspiciously low, they may be using low-grade steel for the mold, which wears out faster and requires more frequent maintenance.

Calculate the true cost per unit by factoring in the expected scrap rate. If the warpage issue causes a 10% scrap rate during mass production, the effective part cost will be significantly higher than a slightly more expensive supplier who uses proper thermal management in the mold design.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Claire Ren
**Date:** 2026-10-26

### Answer 7

Managing this NPI phase requires strict milestone control and change management protocols. Your management team must understand that authorizing hard tool steel cutting without a signed-off soft tool FAI is a critical project risk.

Establish a formal gate review where the engineering team must present the MFA data, physical trial results, and dimensional reports side-by-side. No milestone can be passed without this documentation.

Implement a robust Change Request (CR) process for any tooling adjustments. If the supplier wants to relocate a gate or adjust a cooling channel, it must be documented, evaluated for impact on the part design, and approved before implementation. This prevents unauthorized tooling changes that could alter the structural integrity of the cover. Also, verify their capacity planning.

Ensure they have allocated dedicated press time for your trials and that their production schedule can accommodate the NPI iterations without starving their existing customers. A lack of project coordination at this stage will inevitably lead to missed deadlines during the mass production launch.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Grace Sun
**Date:** 2026-10-26

## Related Resources

- [China Sourcing Q&A](https://www.hyneu.com/questions/china-sourcing/)
- [China Manufacturing Buying Guides](https://www.hyneu.com/buying-guides/china-manufacturing/)
- [Capabilities](https://www.hyneu.com/capabilities/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.hyneu.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Products](https://www.hyneu.com/products/)
- [Industries](https://www.hyneu.com/industries/)
- [Quality & Inspection](https://www.hyneu.com/knowledge/quality-inspection/)
- [Standards & Tolerances](https://www.hyneu.com/knowledge/standards-tolerances/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How to validate a China plastic covers integrated manufacturer for NPI?",
        "text": "I am currently leading the NPI phase for a new line of heavy-duty equipment enclosures, and we are evaluating a China plastic covers integrated manufacturer to produce a series of ABS+PC structural covers. The initial CAD files were sent out, and we received quotes that look highly competitive. However, during the soft tooling phase for the first prototype run, we noticed significant warpage on the larger flat surfaces and dimensional deviations on the snap-fit joints. The supplier attributed this to material shrinkage and suggested moving directly to hard steel tooling to "fix" the tolerance issues, but I am not fully convinced. I need to drive the trial validation effectively before committing to mass production tooling, but I lack visibility into their actual mold flow analysis and process control capabilities. My management is pushing to finalize the supplier to keep the project on schedule, but I am worried that skipping rigorous validation now will lead to massive scrap rates during mass production. How should I structure the trial validation process with this integrated manufacturer? What specific documentation, tooling data, and process parameters should I demand from them before approving the next tooling milestone, and how do I evaluate if they truly have the engineering depth to resolve these dimensional issues rather than just guessing?",
        "answerCount": 7,
        "upvoteCount": 13,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:11:34Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-26T20:13:25Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Validating a structural plastic cover during the NPI phase requires strict adherence to engineering data before committing to mass production tooling. The supplier’s suggestion to move directly to hard steel tooling to resolve warpage and tolerance issues is a significant risk. Warpage on flat ABS+PC covers is typically driven by uneven cooling, inadequate wall thickness, or suboptimal gate placement. Before approving the next tooling milestone, you must require a comprehensive Mold Flow Analysis (MFA) report. This report should include fill time predictions, weld line locations, air trap identification, and critically, a warp vector plot showing the predicted deformation direction and magnitude. A capable manufacturer will use this data to optimize gate positioning and cooling line layout before cutting steel. If the supplier cannot produce this data, or if their MFA does not correlate with the physical soft tool results, they lack the engineering depth to predict and control molding behavior. Regarding the dimensional deviations on the snap-fit joints, material shrinkage is a known variable, not an unpredictable anomaly. A professional manufacturer calculates shrinkage based on the material data sheet, part geometry, and expected molding parameters, then compensates for it during the CNC tooling cutting phase. If the soft tool is out of tolerance, the supplier must provide a root cause analysis. Ask them to explain their holding pressure strategy and gate sizing. Insufficient holding pressure or a prematurely frozen gate can cause localized shrinkage, pulling the snap-fit dimensions out of spec. You should request a First Article Inspection (FAI) report complete with CPK data for all critical dimensions. If the soft tool cannot achieve an acceptable CPK, the hard tool will likely inherit these issues, only magnified under the faster cycle times of mass production. Committing to hard tooling prematurely will severely impact both your project cost and lead time. If the production mold is cut and structural warpage persists due to poor thermal management, you will face costly tooling modifications. Modifying a hardened steel mold to add cooling lines, adjust gate sizes, or correct parting lines requires welding, recutting, and sometimes heat treatment, which can delay the project by four to six weeks. While soft tooling iteration adds a few weeks to the NPI timeline, it is a fraction of the cost and time required to modify a production tool. In injection molding, the true cost drivers are cycle time, scrap rate, and tool maintenance frequency, not just the initial tooling quote. A cheaper initial quote loses its value if the tool requires continuous adjustment or runs at a slower cycle time to compensate for cooling inefficiencies. To evaluate this integrated manufacturer’s true capability, assess their problem-solving methodology and process control. A reliable manufacturer will proactively suggest Design for Manufacturing (DFM) optimizations, such as adding ribs to flat surfaces, adjusting draft angles, or relocating gates to balance flow. They should be willing to run a physical T0 trial using the exact mass production resin and document the actual molding parameters used. Require them to document the melt temperature, mold temperature, injection speed, holding pressure, and cooling time during the trial run. Compare these parameters against the MFA simulation. If they resist providing this data or push back on running proper FAI on soft tools, it indicates they operate as a transactional producer rather than an engineering partner. Furthermore, you need to evaluate their facility's quality control infrastructure. Ask if they utilize in-mold monitoring sensors or scientific molding principles. Scientific molding relies on cavity pressure sensors to ensure consistent filling and packing, which is critical for maintaining tight tolerances on snap-fits across different production runs. If the factory relies solely on machine settings without monitoring what happens inside the mold cavity, they will struggle to maintain dimensional stability during mass production when environmental conditions or material lots vary. Do not let management pressure bypass these engineering gates. Set a clear milestone: No hard tool steel cutting begins until the soft tool FAI achieves dimensional approval and the MFA predictions match the physical trial results. If the supplier cannot demonstrate this correlation, you are risking significant scrap rates during mass production. Your decision should be based on their ability to present data-driven solutions, not just competitive pricing. Drive the validation process by demanding specific engineering deliverables, and use the soft tool data as your ultimate benchmark for mass production readiness.",
            "upvoteCount": 13,
            "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:46:13Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Leo Shen","url": "https://www.hyneu.com/team/leo-shen.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Before committing to mass production tooling, a physical process audit of the manufacturer’s facility is necessary to verify their actual capabilities. The warpage and dimensional issues might stem from inadequate machine tonnage or poor mold temperature control. During the audit, specifically inspect the condition of their injection molding machines. Older machines with worn-out toggle systems may struggle to maintain consistent clamping force, leading to flash and uneven parting lines. Request to see their historical mold maintenance records. A manufacturer that does not perform regular descaling of cooling channels will inevitably produce warped parts. Check if their facility uses water chillers with precise temperature control units for each mold. Furthermore, evaluate their quality control laboratory. Do they have coordinate measuring machines (CMM) capable of scanning complex geometries, or are they relying solely on manual calipers? The presence of advanced inspection equipment directly correlates with their ability to provide reliable First Article Inspection data for your snap-fit deviations.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:44:25Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Victor Luo","url": "https://www.hyneu.com/team/victor-luo.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The transition from soft tooling to hard tooling requires a rigorous prototype validation plan. The supplier should not just hand over the parts; they must provide a Design for Manufacturing (DFM) report that details the expected shrinkage rates and gate locations before any steel is cut. If they skipped the DFM phase, the warpage you are experiencing was entirely predictable. Demand a structured T0 iteration loop. When the soft tool parts warp, the manufacturer must propose specific engineering changes—such as adding cooling lines near the thick sections or modifying the flow leaders—rather than hoping the hard tool will magically solve it. Establish a functional test plan for the snap-fits. Dimensions on a drawing do not guarantee assembly success. Require physical assembly testing of the soft tool components to validate engagement and retention force. If the prototype iteration takes longer than two weeks per cycle, it indicates a lack of in-house tooling maintenance capability, which will severely delay your mass production ramp-up.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:39:08Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Marcus He","url": "https://www.hyneu.com/team/marcus-he.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Post-molding deformation is a hidden risk that often mimics dimensional instability. ABS+PC blends have a tendency to continue crystallizing and shrinking after ejection, especially on large flat surfaces. Ask the manufacturer if they utilize cooling fixtures or jigs to hold the parts in place immediately after demolding. If they simply drop the hot parts into bins, gravity and residual heat will cause warpage that no tooling adjustment can fix. Once the parts are molded, the packaging design becomes critical. Flat plastic covers are highly susceptible to nesting deformation if stacked under pressure. Request a transit testing plan, such as ISTA 1A or 2A, to validate the packaging. The boxes must be designed to support the perimeter of the cover, not the center. Also, verify the label compliance and storage conditions. If the covers are packaged with desiccant but the cardboard absorbs moisture, you may face label adhesion failures or dimensional shifts during ocean freight. Packaging is not just logistics; it is an extension of quality control.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:23:05Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Wendy Gao","url": "https://www.hyneu.com/team/wendy-gao.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "From an end-use perspective, the snap-fit failures and warpage are not just manufacturing defects; they are field performance risks. If the plastic covers warp, the mating surfaces on your final equipment will gap, exposing internal components to dust and moisture. Evaluate the draft angles and engagement ramps on the snap-fits. If the tolerance stack-up is not accounted for, the snaps will either be too loose to hold or too tight, causing stress concentrations that lead to cracking over time. Require physical mock-ups using the soft tool components to simulate the actual assembly process on your production line. This validates not only the fit but the tactile feedback required for operators. Furthermore, consider the environmental exposure of the covers. Ensure the specified ABS+PC grade includes UV stabilizers if the equipment is used outdoors. A supplier that only focuses on hitting dimensional targets without understanding the end-use application will miss critical functional requirements like impact resistance at low temperatures or long-term creep resistance.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:17:04Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Henry Cao","url": "https://www.hyneu.com/team/henry-cao.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The decision to skip soft tool validation and move directly to hard tooling is a false economy that will inflate your overall project cost. While soft tooling seems like an extra expense, it acts as an insurance policy against hard tool modifications. Modifying a production mold requires welding, recutting, and texturing, which can cost thousands of dollars and weeks of lost production time. The initial quote competitiveness vanishes if the cycle time must be extended by 20% just to cool the part enough to prevent warpage. Break down the supplier’s quotation logic. Understand their machine hour rate and how they amortize the tooling cost. If their part price is suspiciously low, they may be using low-grade steel for the mold, which wears out faster and requires more frequent maintenance. Calculate the true cost per unit by factoring in the expected scrap rate. If the warpage issue causes a 10% scrap rate during mass production, the effective part cost will be significantly higher than a slightly more expensive supplier who uses proper thermal management in the mold design.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:15:17Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Claire Ren","url": "https://www.hyneu.com/team/claire-ren.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Managing this NPI phase requires strict milestone control and change management protocols. Your management team must understand that authorizing hard tool steel cutting without a signed-off soft tool FAI is a critical project risk. Establish a formal gate review where the engineering team must present the MFA data, physical trial results, and dimensional reports side-by-side. No milestone can be passed without this documentation. Implement a robust Change Request (CR) process for any tooling adjustments. If the supplier wants to relocate a gate or adjust a cooling channel, it must be documented, evaluated for impact on the part design, and approved before implementation. This prevents unauthorized tooling changes that could alter the structural integrity of the cover. Also, verify their capacity planning. Ensure they have allocated dedicated press time for your trials and that their production schedule can accommodate the NPI iterations without starving their existing customers. A lack of project coordination at this stage will inevitably lead to missed deadlines during the mass production launch.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/ajwi6bwnneotpc2ity.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-26T20:13:25Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Grace Sun","url": "https://www.hyneu.com/team/grace-sun.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.hyneu.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "China Sourcing Q&A", "item": "https://www.hyneu.com/questions/china-sourcing/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "How to validate a China plastic covers integrated manufacturer for NPI?"}
      ]
    }
]
```